Pace
Sounds simple, right? Pace is just speed over distance. But there is more to it than meets the eye.
What is the GAP?
GAP stands for Gradient-Adjusted Pace. In simple words, this pace calculation accounts uphill and downhill movement. The calculation differs depending on your activity type.
Key Differences Between Running and Cycling
- Rolling Resistance Matters:
- In running, energy is mostly used to overcome gravity and metabolic costs.
-
In cycling, rolling resistance plays a role, meaning the energy cost of different gradients isn’t as extreme as in running.
-
Aerodynamic Drag Becomes Significant:
-
At higher cycling speeds, air resistance (drag) is the dominant force on flat terrain, making speed adjustments different from running.
-
Power Output Defines Effort, Not Just Metabolic Cost:
- Cycling effort is measured in watts (W), and power-to-speed relationships follow a cubic relationship on flat ground due to aerodynamic drag.
Running
Per linear correction
- Gradient Conversion
A gradient % corresponds to an angle , which can be approximated as:
- Speed Adjustment Formula
Example Calculation
Let’s say you’re running 12 km/h on a 6% incline ():
If you’re running 12 km/h on a 6% incline, it’s equivalent to running 12.72 km/h on flat ground using the linear correction model. But there is more:
The Minetti Metabolic Cost Model
A widely accepted model for running energy cost was developed by Minetti et al. (2002). It estimates the extra energy required to run at different gradients:
Where:
- C(s) is the metabolic energy cost (Joules per kilogram per meter).
- s is the gradient as a decimal (e.g., a 5% incline → s = 0.05 ).
This formula accounts for the fact that running downhill beyond a certain slope (~ -10%) becomes inefficient due to braking forces. The baseline cost for running on flat terrain is 3.6 J/kg/m. To estimate equivalent flat pace, we can adjust speed using the metabolic cost ratio:
Where:
- is your actual speed on the slope.
- is the estimated equivalent flat speed.
- is the energy cost on flat ground.
- is the energy cost at the given gradient.
Example Calculation
Let’s say you’re running 12 km/h on a 6% incline ():
-
Compute the metabolic cost at 6% slope:
-
Compute adjusted speed:
Conclusion:
If you’re running 12 km/h on a 6% incline, it’s equivalent to running 17.1 km/h on flat ground in terms of effort. That is quite a difference compared to the linear model with a corrected pace of 12.72 km/h.
Why Is the Difference So Big?
- The linear model assumes a fixed percentage effort increase per gradient, which is inaccurate for steep inclines.
- The Minetti model accounts for the true exponential increase in energy demand, meaning the difference in equivalent speed grows significantly as inclines get steeper.
For gradients below ~3%, the linear model is reasonably close, But for steeper inclines, the Minetti model is much more accurate.
Cycling
The required power output for cycling is influenced by:
- Gravitational resistance (on inclines)
- Rolling resistance (constant but varies slightly with slope)
- Aerodynamic drag (depends on speed and wind conditions)
Cycling Power-Based Gradient Adjustment
For a steady climb at constant power, the equivalent speed on flat ground is:
For descending, the correction factor is smaller because aerodynamic drag limits downhill speed increases:
Example Calculation
Let’s say you’re cycling 20 km/h on a 6% incline ( s = 6 ).
Going downhill is not as "easy" to calculate. It increases your effective speed, but - due to air resistance - not linearly.
Forces Acting on a Cyclist on a Slope
The power required to maintain a certain speed while cycling downhill is influenced by:
- Gravity : Helps accelerate the cyclist downhill.
- Rolling Resistance : Always resists motion.
- Aerodynamic Drag : Increases quadratically with speed.
The total force equation on a downhill slope is:
Where:
- = cyclist mass,
- = gravity (9.81 m/s²),
- ,
- (rolling resistance, where is the rolling resistance coefficient),
- (aerodynamic drag, where is the drag coefficient, is frontal area, is air density, and is speed).
Nonlinear Speed Adjustment Formula
Using an approximate power-speed relationship (since power scales with v^3 on flat ground due to drag):
Where:
- is the absolute gradient in percent.
Example Calculation
Let’s say you are cycling at 40 km/h on a -10% downhill slope. Using the nonlinear formula:
With the linear model, the estimated flat-equivalent speed would have been 44 km/h (too high). With the nonlinear model, it’s more realistic at 41.3 km/h, since aerodynamic drag limits speed gains.